<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ideas For Free &#187; copyappbincontent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.libinuko.com/tag/copyappbincontent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.libinuko.com</link>
	<description>Only freedom will grow our ideas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:51:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>StsAdm &#8211;o copyfarmappbincontent is available in CodePlex</title>
		<link>http://blog.libinuko.com/2009/09/06/stsadm-o-copyfarmappbincontent-is-available-in-codeplex/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.libinuko.com/2009/09/06/stsadm-o-copyfarmappbincontent-is-available-in-codeplex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cakriwut</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SharePoint 2007]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyappbincontent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyfarmappbincontent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SharePoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StsAdm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.libinuko.com/2009/09/06/stsadm-o-copyfarmappbincontent-is-available-in-codeplex/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[English Remember about critics to “stsadm –o copyappbincontent” to deploy SharePoint resource in my previous post here. At the end of the post, I think that it should be “stsadm –o copyfarmappbincontent” instead. Why? Because the last will work in centralized deployment mode, same as solution deployment. But what’s the secret? Why the standard [...] <a href="http://blog.libinuko.com/2009/09/06/stsadm-o-copyfarmappbincontent-is-available-in-codeplex/">[read more...]</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>English</p>
<p>Remember about critics to “stsadm –o copyappbincontent” to deploy SharePoint resource in my previous post <a href="http://blog.libinuko.com/2009/04/15/critics-to-sharepoint-resource-deployment-stsadm-o-copyappbincontent/">here</a>.</p>
<p>At the end of the post, I think that it should be “stsadm –o copyfarmappbincontent” instead. </p>
<p>Why?    <br />Because the last will work in centralized deployment mode, same as solution deployment. </p>
<p>But what’s the secret? Why the standard copyappbincontent doesn’t work in farm configuration?</p>
<p>I’ll post in another article. But now, I have created the project in Codeplex. You can grab the code or download the <a href="http://ideasfreestsadm.codeplex.com">binary here</a>.</p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.libinuko.com/2009/09/06/stsadm-o-copyfarmappbincontent-is-available-in-codeplex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

